吉拉西在德甲的终结效率已经得到充分验证，但多特的要价不会低。

即将官宣？詹姆斯回归热火或已无悬念，联手字母哥冲击第五冠

32363 ★

摘要：除此之外，定价机制的缺陷，也曾让公司承受巨额亏损。

” 巴埃纳进一步指出：“他在比赛中做出了许多不易察觉的贡献，这届赛事他的整体发挥堪称卓越。

1、ob体育膝韧带伤势将让他长时间远离赛场，巴萨只能再次等待这位关键球员走完又一段艰难康复之路。

莫德里奇带走的是技术支点和比赛节奏管理能力，拉比奥特带走的是身体对抗与后插上输出，福法纳带走的是覆盖面与传威胁球的能力。ob体育当他在等待VAR裁决时，镜头捕捉到他喃喃自语："求你了，让这个球算吧。

2、大疆正式发布Pocket 4P，多支国产新镜头登场｜势力新鲜报

不管留在巴萨还是转投巴黎，不管未来如何，这一脚已经刻进了历史。

3、许愿！库明加是真不想詹姆斯回骑士！

也就是说，交卷的日子到了。

4、山东泰山对轰三镇，各进3球握手言和，三次四球大败后均无缘胜利

葡萄牙在十六强赛中即被最终的冠军西班牙队淘汰出局，排名应声下滑。

5、超级小年！美媒重排24届新秀：扎克-伊迪冲到第四，卡斯尔登顶

模型公司集体下场造硬件的逻辑只有一个：必须把终端握在自己手里，用户关系和数据飞轮才不会旁落。

与其同期上市的MiniMax，最初明显讲得是一个更接近OpenAI的故事——一边推进多种模型能力的迭代，一边快速将模型能力变成产品矩阵，承担用户获取、商业化的功能。

7月1日到22日，紫光股份股价累计上涨58%，浪潮信息上涨41%。

6、火箭险胜勇士科尔的传切体系让乌度卡很难受火箭赢在哪里

第三，恐惧中美大模型能力代际差的缩短。

对于这份超出预期的财报，市场并未完全买账。

7、Keep野人节倒计时！三位部落酋长已就位

第三类是世界模型与行动模型融合路线。

最后，大厂和模型创业公司都更需要参考的是Anthropic如何把愿景、业务和组织做成了互相嵌套的整体。

8、官方：曼城与埃利奥特-安德森签约至2031年

三场热身赛防线暴露出注意力不集中的隐患，进攻端把握机会能力也受到质疑。

为了让OPC能够以更低的门槛开始创作，万兴科技开放创作工具，以算力作为项目变相投资，项目盈利后双方分成，共建一种新的合作模式。

在2026年美加墨世界杯的舞台上，英格兰与阿根廷的半决赛相遇，北京时间7月16日凌晨3时打响，再次将全球目光聚焦于这对足坛宿敌。

9、为何缺席总决赛？怀特塞德现身酒店，上海男篮伤病说辞难平质疑

以暴增的天齐锂业（002466.SZ）为例，其预计上半年实现归母净利润28.50亿元-42.50亿元，同比增长3276.35%-4934.91%；扣非净利润28.10亿元-42亿元，增幅更是高达212778.79%-318081.82%。

而在刚刚结束的财报电话会上，谷歌CEO Pichai透露，Gemini模型目前每分钟处理220亿个API token，Gemini App月活跃用户已达9.5亿。

10、3换1交易达成！湖人想要的中锋没了，詹姆斯或被送走？

就阵容实力而言，肯定是西班牙强于阿根廷，但梅西越老越妖，本届世界杯已经参与12球，打入了8球，还送出了4次助攻，虽然与10球的姆巴佩争夺金靴有难度，但团队荣誉更加重要。

马斯克在电话会上说，很多客户进店的核心诉求就是FSD，车辆只是配套载体——「他们明确表示只要 FSD，配套什么车型都可以」。

1、太狠了！老詹老了，真的老了，把自己都忘了！

Fluence与美国两大云厂商签订12GW潜在储能项目储备。

2、中国女排世联总决赛16人名单公布 23日晚将对阵美国

我们还希望他们能够部署起来。

3、决策大模型第一股，中科闻歌启动全球发售

但大都会球场的费兰，已经不在乎这些了。火箭对阵尼克斯前瞻乌度卡遭遇较大考验申京或成为比赛的X因素难点在于，各类任务形态迥异。

4、如何为Agent重构操作系统？我们在WAIC看到了答案

当塔希提和新喀里多尼亚这样的球队都能借着扩军的东风触摸世界杯草皮时，中国男足最该认清的现实是：与其在别人的规则里计算概率，不如在自己的泥沼中踏实前行。

5、无法复制的价值！95年乔丹第一次复出有多轰动？魔术师曾为他下跪

据知名记者罗马诺证实，阿斯顿维拉已于近日与球员经纪团队展开新一轮实质性接触。

6、弟弟哭着借88万，儿子问：国外很美？舅妈要旅游，我愣住了

Kimi K3的爆火证明了月之暗面仍然有做出关键模型能力的能力，这是非常关键的一步。

而我也想在一个新的联赛中尝试新的挑战。

但水晶宫并不想放人。

7、习近平总书记对基础教育工作的重要指示在成都引发热烈反响

土耳其俱乐部此前提出了约1000万欧元年薪的待遇方案，但并未与米兰就转会费展开实质性谈判，莱奥本人也对前往土超踢球持保留态度。

福登本人正处于职业生涯的一个微妙节点。

8、萨拉赫罗伯逊全走了，利物浦换帅又换血，芬威体育集团头都大了

大洋彼岸，脑机接口的热度也巨高不下。

哪有这种低风险高收益的股权投资？所以，为了实现这种“既要又要还要”，国资的投委会，研发出不少神器。

反观斯卡洛尼，他打造的这支阿根廷队，在逆境中展现出的坚韧与血性，正是卫冕冠军最宝贵的底蕴。

展会总面积 6 万平方米，452 家国内外企业与机构参展，覆盖 eVTOL 整机、无人机、能源动力、航电系统、先进材料、低空安防、金融服务、产业园区等产业链环节。

前马刺双向合同侧翼将加盟西甲豪门，这对他其实也是一次机会？复杂性创伤后应激心理分析：第五十二讲成为表演型人格看完阿根廷2-1英格兰！不得不承认的5个事实，梅西神纪录难被破高芙被赞体面人火娃登顶无悬念？奥胖集齐大满贯金花提前进决赛

关联文章推荐

加载更多

网站提醒和声明

ob体育公司观察也从多家上市公司获悉，下游景气、需求旺盛，订单饱满。申请删除>> 纠错>> 投诉侵权>> 平台自有内容（文字、图片、界面、榜单、商标、LOGO 等）知识产权归本站所有，未经书面许可，禁止复制、转载、商用。

提交说明：快速提交发布>> 查看提交帮助>> 注册登录>>

赞 16177

踩 41102

最新评论

用户评论55548

请先登录后再发表评论发布

相关推荐

但转念一想，川渝本就是一家亲，德比战以和为贵也挺好。

辛纳未达最佳状态也没赢，兹维列夫必须让进攻成为本能

81473

他要求面试者，必须带上那些苹果还没发布的产品，当着他的面拆开。[2026]

潇湘晨报记者购买2万斤河南西瓜，河南籍地铁建设者吃出家乡味道，还分享两道西瓜美食

79644

自2月以来，他仅在对阵那不勒斯时有过1次首发出场，但没能把握住机会为自己正名。

安盟财险汪清支公司被罚12万，涉员工侵占保险费等

37226

"波罗说道。

拥有这样的庭院，才是真豪宅！

16377

Kimi K3的爆火证明了月之暗面仍然有做出关键模型能力的能力，这是非常关键的一步。

曼晚：引进安德雷和蒂勒曼斯后，曼联并不急于签第三名中场

49960

按SemiAnalysis的测算，年底月产能将达35万片，只比美光的38.5万片少3.5万片。

全域联动、多维赋能，农夫山泉借总台世界杯资源强化国民品牌形象

75135

从赛程安排来看，尽管比赛地点设在亚特兰大的梅赛德斯-奔驰体育场这一中立场地，但英格兰被指定为主队，将身着传统白色主场球衣亮相。

卫健委已将左氧氟沙星列为重点监控药！医生：服用千万注意7点

45255

若米兰、罗马和科莫3队同积71分，那么米兰在此小联赛积分榜积8分排名第1；罗马积4分，直接交锋净胜球-1，排名第2；科莫积4分，直接交锋净胜球-2；米兰和罗马晋级。

落选秀16+10+11夏联唯一三双：率篮网大胜送雷霆唯一8战全败

86208

Nexfin News — China’s lithium battery industry is undergoing a rite of passage, transitioning from wild expansion to disciplined competition. In the first half of the year, a rare divergence between surging corporate earnings and falling stock prices brought a permanent shift in the sector’s underlying dynamics into sharp focus. By mid-July, A-share lithium battery stocks pulled back despite dramatic midyear earnings forecasts. Tianqi Lithium projected net profit growth of up to 4,935% year-over-year, EVE Energy forecast a 95% to 110% increase, and both Sunwoda and REPT BATTERO turned profitable again. Across the supply chain—from upstream lithium salts to downstream battery makers—most companies reported substantial operational gains. Yet robust earnings failed to stop equity valuations from sliding. On July 8, Chengxin Lithium hit its daily downside limit, Yahua Group dropped over 15%, and Tinci Materials saw more than 30 billion yuan in market value evaporate within a week. Ganfeng Lithium has fallen roughly 38% from its peak, while market leader CATL is down about 20%. The immediate trigger for the selloff was the resumption of operations at CATL’s Jianxiawo lithium mine. On June 29, the mine secured its safety production permit, which was officially posted on the Credit China website on July 7. The site—the world’s largest single lepidolite mine—had been idle for over ten months. With an annual capacity of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate, it previously accounted for 8% to 10% of China’s total output. Its return brings over 45,000 tons of additional supply in the second half of the year, hitting elevated lithium prices head-on. Futures markets reacted instantly: on June 18, as restart speculation grew, the main lithium carbonate contract fell 6.58% in a single session, beginning a steady slide from its May high of 205,000 yuan per ton. This stark contrast between thriving industrial output and falling stock prices coincided on the surface with lithium carbonate pulling back rapidly from its May peak of 200,000 yuan per ton to 151,000 yuan. But a more critical question remains: is this the sign of a cyclical peak, or is the industry undergoing a profound revaluation? Answering that requires stepping back to examine the paradigm shift that unfolded across the lithium battery sector between 2025 and 2026. The essence of this shift is not the fluctuation of any single price signal, but a permanent realignment of the industry's competitive playbook—moving from "who expands the fastest" to "who possesses technology, steady profits, and global compliance capabilities." From 60,000 to 200,000 In late June 2025, battery-grade lithium carbonate dropped below 60,000 yuan per ton, touching a three-year low of 59,900 yuan. Lithium salt producers across the sector incurred heavy losses, forcing widespread shutdowns among small and medium-sized manufacturers. From Australian hard-rock mines and small African projects to domestic lepidolite producers, virtually all marginal capacity went offline that summer. A two-and-a-half-year price slump accomplished its single necessary function: clearing out excess supply. By the fourth quarter of 2025, supply and demand dynamics reversed faster than the market had anticipated. The initial spark came from energy storage demand. Data from research firms including InfoLink show that global energy storage cell shipments reached roughly 610 GWh in 2025, up over 90% year-over-year, with fourth-quarter volumes alone topping 200 GWh. Production schedules showed energy storage cells clearing lithium carbonate inventories at an accelerating quarter-over-quarter pace. As growth in electric vehicle batteries moderated, energy storage stepped in not just to absorb excess capacity, but as the industry's primary growth engine. Surging demand was only half the story; supply contracted just as sharply. Small African mines and high-cost domestic lepidolite operations exited the market. Meanwhile, Zimbabwe announced a temporary suspension of lithium concentrate exports in February—a country that accounted for 15.5% of China’s lithium concentrate imports in 2025. Although Australia remained the primary pillar of China's upstream raw material supply at over 50%, the policy further tightened market expectations surrounding upstream supply. Zimbabwe's Ministry of Mines later confirmed that a formal export ban would take effect in January 2027. The tension between supply and demand peaked with the onset of a structural global deficit. Morgan Stanley estimated in early 2026 that the global market would face a shortfall of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) for the year. Soochow Securities calculated total annual lithium mine supply at approximately 2.14 million tons, representing 440,000 tons of new capacity—most of which was not slated to come online until after the third quarter. That timing gap fueled the price rally during the first half of the year. Driven by these converging forces and inventory restocking across midstream channels, lithium carbonate surged from 70,000 yuan per ton in October 2025 to 200,000 yuan by May 2026. Unlike the speculative frenzy that drove prices to 600,000 yuan in 2022, this recovery occurred after capacity had been fully built out, anchored firmly by real end-user demand. Gaogong Industry Research Institute (GGII) summarized the shift: "This is not a bubble, but a return to fundamental value. The structural surge in energy storage demand, combined with supply-side consolidation, has redefined a rational price band for lithium." Prices doubled quickly due to market sentiment and downstream stockpiling. July’s price correction reflected two main factors: the gradual release of new supply and downstream resistance to inflated raw material costs. Analysts generally expect lithium carbonate to trade within a median range of 120,000 to 160,000 yuan per ton for the full year—a price level that keeps most producers profitable without triggering another round of reckless expansion. Energy Storage as the New Engine In the first half of 2026, China's energy storage battery shipments reached roughly 485 GWh, a year-over-year increase of over 80%. Over the same period, power battery shipments totaled roughly 630 GWh, up over 30%. The gap between the two segments is narrowing rapidly. Structural figures are even more telling. In the first quarter of 2026, Chinese energy storage battery shipments totaled about 209 GWh, up 115% year-over-year and accounting for roughly 40% of total lithium battery shipments. By June, energy storage cells made up nearly 41% of monthly production schedules—up from around 30% a year earlier. According to InfoLink, full-year energy storage cell shipments in 2025 reached roughly 610 GWh, approaching 70% of power battery shipments over the same timeframe. Energy storage is no longer a side business for battery makers; it has emerged as an independent market reshaping demand across the industry. Behind this market realignment lies a fundamental shift in purchasing drivers. Before 2024, domestic energy storage growth was driven primarily by mandatory integration policies, which required wind and solar projects to install storage capacity. That regulatory setup created low-quality demand, leading to poor utilization, weak financial returns, and inconsistent cell quality. Between 2025 and 2026, market dynamics pivoted from regulatory compliance to commercial economics. The shift first materialized in the domestic market. In early 2026, the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration jointly issued new capacity pricing regulations (NDRC Pricing [2026] No. 114), establishing a national capacity tariff mechanism for standalone energy storage facilities. Local standards were set between 165 and 330 yuan per kilowatt-year, depending on the province. Surveys by Soochow Securities indicated that internal rates of return (IRR) for storage stations in several provinces crossed the 6% threshold required for commercial viability, especially where peak-to-valley price spreads exceeded 0.3 yuan per kWh. IRRs for top-tier projects reached as high as 10%, fundamentally improving overall demand quality. This domestic turning point coincided with an explosion in international demand. Major solar-plus-storage projects launched across the Middle East, particularly in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with individual project capacities regularly reaching several gigawatt-hours. In emerging markets across Australia, Southeast Asia, and Africa, weak power grids and rising renewable energy penetration transformed energy storage from an optional luxury into a necessity. Soochow Securities calculated that utility-scale storage installations in emerging markets grew 233% year-over-year in 2025, with an additional 69% increase projected for 2026. In Europe, energy security concerns and green energy quotas kept commercial, industrial, and residential demand robust. GGII projects that global energy storage battery shipments in 2026 will reach 800 to 1,100 GWh, representing year-over-year growth of 30% to 70%. Even at the mid-point estimate of 900 GWh, energy storage output is positioned to approach or match power battery production this year. As the industry's primary growth engine shifts, its core operational requirements are evolving as well. Power battery demand is dominated by automakers, whose priority is cost efficiency. The customer base for energy storage, however, is far more diverse: utility operators prioritize long cycle life and safety, data center owners require high discharge rates and extreme reliability, and overseas projects demand lifecycle compliance and supply-chain traceability. Winning in these markets requires technological adaptation, solid project execution, and international compliance capabilities rather than sheer scale. Oversupply or Industry Maturity? Evaluating battery utilization rates requires a closer look at the underlying numbers. In May 2026, the single-month installation rate for Chinese power batteries dropped to roughly 38%. Over the first five months of the year, cumulative power battery installations totaled 259 GWh against 863 GWh produced—yielding an overall utilization rate of about 30%. Factory output continues to outpace vehicle installations, leaving a substantial share of manufacturing lines underutilized. The five-year trajectory of Chinese power battery installation rates tells a clear story: 70% in 2021, 54% in 2022, roughly 52% in 2023, 50% in 2024, 44% in 2025, and 38% by May 2026. This steady decline in installation rates offers clear evidence of an industry transitioning from rapid early growth into maturity. Yet labeling the sector simply as oversupplied misses crucial nuances. The market is not experiencing a uniform glut; rather, it is undergoing sharp structural polarization. High-end shortages coexist alongside low-end surpluses. Demand for premium batteries with energy densities above 160 Wh/kg—primarily ternary chemistries—rebounded sharply, rising from a 6% market share in 2025 to 11%. Meanwhile, low-end products under 125 Wh/kg have effectively been phased out. Demand has also diverged sharply between commercial and passenger vehicles. Driven by subsidy policies, battery demand for electric heavy trucks and delivery vans surged, with battery consumption for electric cargo vans rising 169% year-over-year. By contrast, electric buses—once the industry's primary market—fell to fifth place. While market leadership remains dynamic, the nature of competitive moats is shifting. CATL and BYD together retain a 68% market share, but second-tier players like Gotion High-tech, EVE Energy, Svolt Energy, and Hithium are making gains. Competition is shifting from pure capacity expansion to technological differentiation and operating margins. From another perspective, declining installation rates are a natural hallmark of industry maturity. As annual growth moderates, a drop in capacity utilization from 70% to 40% is to be expected. While systemic capacity pressures continue to weigh on industry-wide profitability, and smaller players face ongoing price competition, market leaders retain the balance sheet strength to navigate the transition. As top-line growth slows, manufacturers lacking proprietary technology, accumulated capital, or global compliance infrastructure risk being squeezed out. This shift explains recent strategic course corrections by major capital allocators. Anode producer Sinomatech canceled a 10.3 billion yuan expansion, cathode supplier Dynanonic abandoned a 10 billion yuan project, and separator manufacturer Semcorp terminated a roughly 2 billion yuan facility in Malaysia. Top-tier players reining in massive investments is a classic sign of an industry transitioning from early expansion to financial discipline. This reallocation of capital does not mean expansion has halted entirely. In the first half of 2026, manufacturers announced over 65 new planned projects representing more than 1,500 GWh of capacity and over 220 billion yuan in total investment. Hunan Yuneng disclosed a 24 billion yuan expansion, while Yahua Group announced additional capacity in Zimbabwe. Expansion continues, but the prerequisites have changed: only enterprises with strong technical barriers, cash reserves, and global compliance infrastructure are positioned to invest while competitors scale back. Technology Race 2.0: Three Fronts If the period between 2022 and 2024 was defined by a race for manufacturing scale, 2025 and 2026 have marked a pivot toward technological differentiation across three distinct fronts. Front One: Structural Shortages in 314Ah Cells The central operational focus for the energy storage supply chain in 2026 has been a structural shortage of 314Ah cells rather than short-term price swings in raw lithium. By March, average spot prices for 314Ah cells from tier-one manufacturers approached 0.40 yuan per Wh, with small-lot orders reaching 0.45 yuan per Wh—a surge of over 25% within six months compared to the 0.30 to 0.34 yuan per Wh seen in August 2025. The immediate driver was rising raw lithium costs—at 180,000 yuan per ton of lithium carbonate, theoretical cell production costs sit between 0.35 and 0.38 yuan per Wh. However, the root cause was a supply gap during the industry's transition to larger formats. As manufacturers shift from 280Ah and 314Ah form factors toward 500Ah+ designs, investment in legacy 314Ah production lines has largely ceased. Because next-generation 500Ah+ cell capacity will not scale up until late 2026, production ramps and customer testing created a temporary bottleneck. During this supply gap, the deficit widened significantly, pushing delivery timelines for select orders into 2027. This dynamic reflects a clear shift in industry economics: market returns are no longer guaranteed simply by bringing capacity online, but by executing format transitions ahead of competitors. CATL has already deployed its 587Ah cell in a 2.4 GWh standalone storage project in Inner Mongolia, while EVE Energy has accelerated mass production of its 628Ah format. With the shift toward larger cell formats underway, manufacturing execution is everything. While 314Ah supply constraints present an immediate operational challenge, solid-state technology represents the long-term competitive battlefield. Front Two: A Return to Realism in Solid-State Batteries Although 2026 has been touted as the inaugural year for commercial solid-state battery deployment, that label requires qualification: current production consists almost entirely of semi-solid (hybrid liquid-solid) chemistries. Models including the NIO ET9, MG4, GAC Hyper, and Chery vehicles have entered the market equipped with semi-solid packs featuring energy densities between 350 and 400 Wh/kg. Because these designs remain compatible with over 90% of existing liquid battery production lines, retooling costs remain manageable and rollout schedules are accelerating. However, the commercial reality of all-solid-state technology remains far more complex than vehicle showroom specifications suggest. In March 2026, Ouyang Minggao, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, offered a candid assessment: "To be prudent, it is best not to commercialize all-solid-state battery vehicles over the next two years." He cited three major technical hurdles: solid-solid interface stability, where microscopic gaps between solid electrolytes and electrodes cause internal resistance to spike; lithium dendrite formation and safety risks; and the environmental volatility of sulfide electrolytes, which decompose upon exposure to moisture and demand strict manufacturing conditions. Industry leaders report steady if measured progress. CATL’s sulfide-based solid-state cell has surpassed an energy density of 500 Wh/kg, with small-scale production anticipated in 2027. BYD’s 20 GWh facility in Chongqing is scheduled to begin semi-solid production in the third quarter of 2026, targeting pilot runs for all-solid-state cells in 2027. Gotion High-tech plans to initiate operations on a 2 GWh solid-state line by late 2026, while EVE Energy has produced sample 60Ah solid-state cells. A clear timeline has taken shape: 2026 is focused on pilot line verification, 2027 on vehicle testing, and 2030 on potential large-scale commercialization. The implementation of recommended national standard GB/T 43568-2026 (Solid-State Batteries for Electric Vehicles) on July 1, 2026, established an initial regulatory framework for long-term development. Ultimately, 2026 marks less the mass adoption of solid-state technology than a recalibration of market expectations. Meanwhile, an underappreciated demand driver is quietly gathering momentum. Front Three: AIDC Storage as AI Infrastructure In the first five months of 2026, global energy storage shipments for AI data centers (AIDC) reached 10 GWh, surpassing total volume for all of 2025. Industry research firms project that global AIDC storage demand will reach 300 to 400 GWh by 2030—more than twenty times its 2025 level. Capital deployment in the segment is ramping up. CATL invested roughly 4.1 billion yuan to acquire a strategic stake in Senter Power to secure positioning in high-voltage DC power distribution for data centers, while winning a bid for a 2 GW / 4 GWh storage project at a computing center in Guizhou. Fluence signed agreements covering a 12 GW pipeline of potential projects with two major U.S. cloud providers, LG secured eight data center storage contracts totaling 6 GWh—including projects for Oracle—and Panasonic announced 350 billion yen in battery investment aimed at tripling its data center storage revenue. The expansion of AIDC storage is driven by a widening gap between AI computing power demands and utility grid capacity. Power consumption per rack in modern AI facilities has jumped from 5–8 kW in traditional data centers to 40–100 kW, while grid connection approvals and capacity upgrades often take three to five years. Onsite battery systems serve both as backup power and as a bridge to accelerate facility commissioning. Energy storage is moving from an auxiliary fallback to an integrated structural component of data centers. Following NVIDIA’s October 2025 announcement of an 800V DC power architecture—designed to phase out diesel generators and legacy uninterruptible power supplies (UPS)—storage systems are being wired directly into primary distribution networks. This shift expands the market beyond traditional buyers like power utilities and renewable energy developers to encompass cloud providers and infrastructure operators, establishing a distinct category of demand. Globalization 2.0 While domestic market consolidation marks the industry’s initial transition to maturity, international expansion presents a secondary test. Tariff structures, raw material access, and regulatory standards are tightening concurrently across major export markets. Trade barriers represent the most immediate hurdle. The European Union’s countervailing duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles have been in effect for five years and are expanding to include plug-in hybrids. In the United States, the Inflation Reduction Act continues to raise domestic content requirements for power and energy storage batteries. Concurrently, China has reduced its export tax rebates for batteries from 9% to 6% as of April 2026, with complete elimination scheduled for January 2027. Rising trade costs are accelerating a shift from direct product exports to localized overseas manufacturing. At the same time, competition over raw materials is intensifying. The U.S.-led Minerals Security Partnership continues work to build key mineral supply chains outside China, while changing rules in jurisdictions like Zimbabwe highlight shifting export policies. Strategic positioning across raw material supply chains remains an ongoing operational priority. Regulatory compliance presents a quieter but more complex technical hurdle. The European Union’s Battery Passport regulations will become mandatory on February 18, 2027, requiring detailed disclosure of lifecycle carbon footprints, material origins, and recycled content percentages. The impact of these rules depends heavily on how accounting frameworks are defined; systematic discrepancies in baseline emissions databases regarding Chinese energy mixes or manufacturing processes could affect market access. In response, leading Chinese manufacturers are moving from passive compliance to active engagement with international standards. CATL has partnered with BMW and Germany’s Catena-X network to help establish over 90 baseline carbon accounting metrics. BYD invested over 100 million yuan to develop its "i-Carbon Chain" platform for digital carbon tracking across its supply chain. Similarly, REPT BATTERO collaborated with TÜV Rheinland and Circulor on a battery passport initiative, securing third-party verification for 98 independent datasets from an EU Notified Body. Overseas manufacturing footprints are expanding in tandem: CATL’s production complex in Hungary, BYD’s plant in Brazil, Gotion High-tech’s joint venture in the United States, and Envision AESC’s gigafactory in Spain. Chinese battery makers are transitioning from a model of centralized domestic production for export toward localized manufacturing aligned with international standards. This next phase of international expansion hinges on regulatory transparency, supply chain control, and deep local integration. Beyond Maturity In July 2026, as equity valuations diverged from corporate earnings across the lithium sector, market participants wrestled with where the industry stands in its broader evolution. The most visible change is the shift in growth drivers. With energy storage shipments reaching 485 GWh in the first half of the year to account for over 40% of total output, the gap between storage and mobility applications is closing rapidly. This demand-side pivot coincides with capacity rebalancing on the supply side, where power battery installation rates have adjusted from 70% down to the 30%–40% range, signaling an end to early, unbridled expansion while overall margins remain under pressure. These structural shifts are redefining entry barriers across the market. With 314Ah cell prices rising over 25% in six months and AIDC storage demand expanding rapidly, technical capabilities are increasingly determining market positioning. As national standards for solid-state technology take effect and EU Battery Passport deadlines approach, regulatory compliance has become a baseline operational requirement. The trajectory of lithium carbonate—falling to 60,000 yuan, rebounding to 200,000, and settling near 150,000—reflects a market seeking equilibrium. This broader transition was highlighted by a joint policy announcement on July 18, when three Chinese government ministries introduced a new consumption tax structure for batteries. Effective September 1, lithium-ion batteries are subject to a 2% consumption tax, rising to 4% in September 2027, while sodium-ion and solid-state batteries remain exempt through the end of 2028. The policy ends a tax exemption for lithium batteries that spanned more than a decade. Phasing in taxation uses fiscal policy to encourage capacity optimization and technological upgrading by taxing established chemistries while incentivizing next-generation alternatives. For second-tier cell makers operating on narrow margins, the 2% tax burden—equivalent to roughly 0.007 to 0.008 yuan per Wh—will further compress operating margins, reinforcing market consolidation around capitalized leaders. For China's lithium battery industry, 2026 represents a clear inflection point. Enterprises equipped with proprietary technology, international compliance frameworks, and established brand equity face a broader global landscape as the sector matures. Conversely, manufacturers reliant on single customers, lacking technical moats, or unable to meet evolving compliance standards face mounting pressure. The early expansion phase of the lithium battery industry has drawn to a close. Its mature chapter is just beginning. (This article was first published on the TMTPost App. Author | AGI-Signal, Editor | Zhao Hongyu)梅西走下世界杯赛场，变身硅谷投资人。

韩国出线机会渺茫！德国爆冷输球，日本战平瑞典！

70067

名字取完，路还是得自己走。

比肩军工巨头洛马！Anduril据悉洽谈新一轮融资估值有望升至约1000亿美元

68026

加载更多